文章来源:重庆百姓网   发布时间:2019-12-04 20:50:58|下载7l期马会资料  【字号:      】  


  To the Editor:

  Re “Mueller Finds No Trump-Russia Conspiracy” (front page, March 25):

  Let me get this straight: Numerous members of Donald Trump’s campaign and family had contacts and meetings with Russia-connected individuals; they repeatedly lied about and tried to cover this up; Jared Kushner tried to set up a private, unmonitored communication link with the Kremlin; Mr. Trump met alone with Vladimir Putin without any American officials present; and Mr. Trump has repeatedly praised Mr. Putin and attempted to undermine NATO.

  If there was no fire, as the Mueller report allegedly determined, what was behind all the smoke? Americans deserve to know.

  Harlan KossonPittsford, N.Y.

  To the Editor:

  Re “A Cloud Over Trump’s Presidency Is Lifted” (news analysis, nytimes.com, March 24):

  A cloud has not lifted. The special counsel showed a storm of proven criminality surrounding a president and his campaign, delivering 34 indictments that resulted in seven guilty pleas and jail time for top presidential advisers. Among those indicted were Russian intelligence officers and other nationals and three Russian companies. And numerous investigations continue under federal and state prosecutors. These are the results that should be broadcast.

  By not acknowledging and addressing this, the president makes cleanup messier and further weakens American leadership and its inspirational role in the world. That the president and others consider this a triumph is itself a cloud.

  Jeffrey AinisAlhambra, Calif.

  To the Editor:

  Robert Mueller’s report doesn’t make Donald Trump any less a racist or liar. It doesn’t explain his love for dictators, his disdain for American allies or his contempt for intelligence agencies, the press and confirmed science. It certainly doesn’t make him unimpeachable. In fact, there’s no vindication for Mr. Trump simply because the Mueller report failed to find a Trump-Russia conspiracy. Mr. Trump is still a very real threat to our democracy, and Congress should do everything in its power to stop him.

  Janis AdlerPortland, Ore.

  To the Editor:

  Re “Mueller Demurs So Barr Makes a Key Decision” (front page, March 25):

  There is much speculation as to why Robert Mueller chose not to reach a conclusion as to whether President Trump committed obstruction of justice but explicitly declined to exonerate him. Allow me to join in that speculation by suggesting that it may have been an extraordinary act of patriotism and self-restraint by this uncommonly heroic and honorable special counsel.

  He may have recognized that if he found that the president committed obstruction, Attorney General William Barr would have rejected that finding, either because in briefing the attorney general that became clear or because of the attorney general’s known hostility to an obstruction charge from his unsolicited 19-page memorandum to the Justice Department before his appointment.

  The special counsel may have sought to avoid the divisive consequences of a futile recommendation. If this was the case, it only underscores the wrongfulness of Mr. Barr’s refusal to recuse himself.

  Sidney RosdeitcherNew YorkThe writer is a lawyer.

  To the Editor:

  The Mueller report is now finished, and I am ready to put it behind us. Yes, there are lots of questions left open and lots of legal proceedings that may occur. But it is now as clear as it’s ever going to be that whatever judgment lapses or foreign intrusions occurred in the 2016 election, there is little evidence that indictable offenses were committed by the president.

  I think it is time for the president to act presidential — thanking Robert Mueller and the Justice Department for their professionalism, and urging people on all sides to get on with life and the business of governing. Crowing by one party and continued grubbing around in the carcass of the dispute by the other only distract from more important work we have to do.

  William R. AndersenSeattleThe writer is a former law professor at the University of Washington Law School.

  To the Editor:

  The New York Times, the rest of the hate-Donald Trump media and the Democrats owe President Trump and the country a sincere apology. I, for one, am not holding my breath waiting.

  Gerald KatzEdwards, Colo.

  To the Editor:

  President Trump says the report is “total exoneration.” Now, wouldn’t it be refreshing if he dealt with Russia’s attempt to fiddle with America’s election results? If he is determined to be a real leader, he should be expressing his outrage as an American, and actively seeking ways to punish Russia and to protect the results of future elections.

  Unfortunately, Donald Trump only recognizes threats to his own reputation. The integrity of our democracy isn’t even on his radar.

  Howard SchmittGreen Tree, Pa.

  To the Editor:

  How can it be concluded that there was no conspiracy between Russia and the Trump campaign given that President Trump was never cross-examined by the investigators, the content of Mr. Trump’s private meetings with Vladimir Putin has never been disclosed, and Mr. Trump’s subordinates, including Paul Manafort and Roger Stone, lied to the investigators?

  Richard JoffeNew York

  To the Editor:

  I strongly suspect that most Republicans, if they are honest with themselves, are more relieved right now than anything else. If they believed President Trump to be capable of colluding with Russia, what does that say about Mr. Trump? What does that say about Republicans?

  Cyd Joan CheekKnife River, Minn.

  To the Editor:

  Attorney General William Barr has incorrectly concluded that an obstruction of justice charge against the president could have no validity absent a finding of an underlying crime. The United States Code’s obstruction statute does not contain that requirement. The statute merely codifies the importance of deterring those who, with wrongful intent, would interfere with the pursuit of justice. Congress will doubtless make its own determination whether the president obstructed justice.

  William C. IbershofMill Valley, Calif.The writer is a former federal prosecutor.

  To the Editor:

  Wouldn’t it be glorious if we had a president who could say: “I’m glad we had this investigation. The results prove that our democracy works.” Instead, Attorney General William Barr’s summary emboldens our would-be tyrant to go after his “enemies.” What a tragedy!

  Fran KaufmanNew York



  下载7l期马会资料“【本】【体】【是】【植】【物】【的】【化】【形】【魔】【兽】?”【古】【元】【看】【了】【何】【明】【一】【眼】,【便】【大】【致】【清】【楚】【了】【面】【前】【这】【人】【的】【底】【细】。 【很】【稀】【奇】【的】【存】【在】,【但】【对】【于】【辽】【阔】【无】【比】,【无】【奇】【不】【有】【的】【斗】【气】【大】【陆】【而】【言】,【存】【在】【植】【物】【魔】【兽】【并】【不】【奇】【怪】。 【从】【这】【人】【挡】【下】【他】【随】【手】【一】【击】,【古】【元】【大】【致】【可】【以】【看】【出】【来】【这】【个】【人】【是】【一】【个】【斗】【圣】。 “【你】【的】【实】【力】【不】【错】……【不】【过】【你】【说】【那】【个】【小】【女】【孩】【是】【你】【的】【徒】【弟】?【也】【就】【是】【说】

  【玄】【蚕】【吞】【掉】【金】【钵】,【佛】【威】【魔】【念】【被】【李】【不】【琢】【融】【为】【一】【剑】,【猛】【然】【劈】【下】! 【剑】【锋】【所】【至】,【那】【破】【庙】【如】【冰】【遇】【火】,【就】【这】【么】【消】【失】【在】【原】【地】。 【电】【光】【火】【石】【间】,【李】【不】【琢】【出】【剑】,【收】【手】。 【那】【破】【庙】【已】【不】【见】【踪】【影】,【不】【光】【破】【庙】,【整】【个】【天】【柱】【山】,【被】【一】【道】【深】【渊】【从】【中】【分】【开】。 【深】【渊】【两】【壁】,【无】【论】【是】【岩】【石】、【树】【木】、【泥】【土】【断】【面】【都】【平】【滑】【光】【洁】,【像】【是】【被】【精】【心】【磨】【洗】【过】【了】。 【这】

  【羊】【人】? 【黑】【夜】【一】【族】? 【众】【人】【先】【是】【愣】【了】【愣】,【这】【才】【想】【起】【他】【们】【到】【底】【是】【来】【干】【嘛】【的】【了】,【之】【前】【被】【李】【清】【华】【的】【脑】【洞】【这】【么】【一】【打】【岔】,【完】【全】【忘】【了】【这】【回】【事】【儿】【啊】! 【对】【啊】,【那】【群】【顶】【着】【羊】【头】【的】【怪】【物】【都】【跑】【去】【哪】【了】?! 【环】【顾】【着】【周】【围】【的】【城】【镇】【废】【墟】,【感】【受】【着】【风】【声】【穿】【过】【石】【缝】【木】【板】【传】【来】【的】【呜】【咽】,【苏】【小】【茜】【不】【由】【得】【缩】【了】【缩】【脖】【子】:“【你】【们】【有】【没】【有】【发】【现】【这】【里】【安】【静】【得】【有】

  “【绝】【了】!” 【傍】【晚】【时】【分】,【槐】【诗】【端】【详】【着】【候】【车】【室】【外】【面】【张】【贴】【的】【通】【知】,【目】【瞪】【口】【呆】:“【豪】【华】【列】【车】【也】【会】【晚】【点】?” “【只】【是】【晚】【点】【而】【已】,【又】【不】【是】【爆】【炸】,【总】【有】【一】【些】【大】【家】【都】【不】【想】【的】【事】【情】【会】【发】【生】。” 【肩】【头】【的】【乌】【鸦】【淡】【定】【的】【说】:“【况】【且】,【如】【果】【真】【要】【准】【点】【发】【车】【的】【话】,【昨】【天】【人】【家】【就】【走】【了】。【你】【今】【天】【买】【票】【怎】【么】【来】【得】【及】【啊】?” “【说】【实】【话】,【我】【有】【一】【种】【这】

  【事】【虽】【然】【告】【一】【段】【落】,【可】【毕】【竟】【发】【生】【了】【这】【般】【大】【的】【事】【情】,【十】【几】【条】【人】【命】,【还】【有】【三】【具】【是】【凌】【波】【镖】【行】【护】【卫】【的】【尸】【体】,【护】【卫】【们】【将】【尸】【体】【搬】【到】【庙】【的】【后】【门】【外】【堆】【放】【着】。 【为】【何】【说】【三】【具】,【只】【是】【因】【为】【那】【重】【伤】【的】【一】【人】,【在】【张】【远】【遥】【盘】【问】【出】【结】【果】【后】【也】【没】【能】【留】【下】【活】【口】,【张】【远】【遥】【用】【一】【支】【匕】【首】【刺】【入】【脊】【椎】,【结】【束】【了】【这】【已】【没】【有】【价】【值】【之】【人】。【徐】【莫】【行】【看】【在】【眼】【里】,【心】【里】【却】【已】【不】【再】【起】【波】下载7l期马会资料【九】【十】【分】? 【猫】【女】【郎】【原】【本】【晕】【乎】【乎】【的】【脑】【袋】【被】【这】【个】【数】【字】【一】【炸】,【变】【得】【清】【醒】【了】【一】【些】。 【太】【高】【了】【吧】——【她】【想】。 【从】【小】【到】【大】,【猫】【女】【郎】【一】【直】【在】【被】【要】【求】【做】【得】【更】【好】。 “【为】【什】【么】【别】【人】【能】【做】【到】【一】【百】【分】,【而】【你】【做】【不】【到】?”【记】【忆】【中】,【妈】【妈】【总】【是】【用】【这】【样】【的】【话】【语】【去】【指】【责】【她】。 【小】【小】【的】【猫】【女】【郎】【辨】【白】【道】:“【我】【至】【少】【也】【有】【八】【十】【分】【了】【吧】?【每】【天】【擦】【地】、【洗】【碗】

  【许】【昌】【交】【战】【后】,【左】【慈】【生】【死】【不】【知】,【下】【落】【不】【明】。 【而】【原】【本】【大】【战】【连】【连】【的】【各】【家】【集】【团】,【也】【签】【订】【长】【达】【五】【年】【的】【和】【平】【协】【议】。 【以】【许】【都】【为】【界】【限】,【每】【个】【人】【都】【划】【分】【了】【各】【自】【的】【势】【力】【所】【属】。 【司】【马】【懿】【和】【曹】【丕】【张】【角】【等】【心】【怀】【各】【异】【的】【人】,【仍】【旧】【追】【随】【刘】【协】【一】【同】,【驻】【守】【汉】【王】【集】【团】,【他】【们】【占】【据】【着】【许】【昌】【以】【西】,【司】【隶】,【凉】【州】【等】【地】。 【蜀】【汉】【集】【团】【接】【回】【了】【关】【羽】,【他】【们】【占】

  【在】【这】【片】【大】【陆】【上】,【斯】【卡】【迪】【亚】【公】【国】【与】【罗】【那】【尔】【克】【王】【国】【之】【间】【的】【战】【争】,【带】【来】【了】【太】【多】【的】【死】【亡】【与】【杀】【戮】。 【无】【论】【政】【治】、【科】【技】、【经】【济】【亦】【或】【军】【事】【与】【民】【生】,【斯】【卡】【迪】【亚】【公】【国】【都】【比】【罗】【那】【尔】【克】【王】【国】【要】【强】【大】【得】【多】。 【因】【为】【相】【对】【自】【由】【而】【人】【权】【的】【政】【治】【体】【制】,【大】【陆】【上】【的】【许】【多】【人】【才】【都】【汇】【聚】【于】【斯】【卡】【迪】【亚】【公】【国】,【在】【那】【里】,【顶】【尖】【的】【行】【业】【人】【才】、【大】【商】【人】,【渐】【渐】【拥】【有】【了】【与】【贵】

  【几】【只】【小】【小】【的】【吊】【篮】【从】【切】【尔】【西】【城】【的】【城】【墙】【上】【缓】【缓】【下】【降】,【里】【面】【乘】【坐】【的】【是】【切】【尔】【西】【侯】【爵】【和】【他】【的】【贴】【身】【侍】【卫】【们】,【在】【经】【过】【了】【一】【阵】【紧】【张】【的】【天】【人】【交】【战】【后】,【切】【尔】【西】【侯】【爵】【最】【终】【决】【定】【出】【城】【见】【兽】【人】【王】【巴】【顿】·【康】【沃】【尔】【一】【面】,【这】【事】【关】【切】【尔】【西】【城】【的】【安】【危】。 【切】【尔】【西】【侯】【爵】【很】【想】【带】【着】【他】【的】【军】【队】【一】【同】【出】【城】,【这】【样】【的】【做】【法】【可】【以】【为】【切】【尔】【西】【侯】【爵】【带】【来】【一】【丝】【丝】【的】【安】【全】【感】,【可】【要】【想】





© 2012 - 2019 版权所有 京ICP备09007985号  京公网安备110103600079号   联系我们